Posts

Showing posts from July, 2021
Image
 Functional Qigongs 2   Going back to the example in Functional Qigongs 1 of the qi-tissues of the chest, arms, and dantian pulling the arms inward and using breath … do that a few times as a warmup and then let's look at a slight tangent to some of the same tissues or tissues nearby.   If you look at a diagram of the muscle-tendon channels (the muscle and tendon paths/channels upon which the acupuncture "meridians" are based), you can see that there are three channels that are used to lift and Open the arms: large intestine, small intestine, and triple burner.  The 3 Yin channels are, of course, used to contract and Close the arms.  Notice that the Yang muscle-tendon channels that pull the arm upward are rooted in the head and neck: something higher on the body from which to hang the arms. So, try this experiment.  Let the arms hang loosely to the front and sides of the body.   Lean the head backward to help make some pre-tension (take out the slack) in the t
Image
  Functional Qigongs   Know Your Qi and Know When People don't know their Qi   The qi-related tissues of the body are ones that involve involuntary-muscle systems controlled by the subconscious.  Respiration tissues fall into this category because they are controlled both by the motor cortex and by the brain stem under subconscious/unconscious control.  Much of the discussion about "qi" has to do with the subconscious control of the involuntary-muscle tissue systems and, often, the voluntary control of respiration for physical training.   The ancient Chinese took the involuntary-muscle systems into account when they analyzed human strength and motion, but the ancient Chinese also postulated (remember, this was thousands of years ago) an unseen energetic part of the whole qi-paradigm in order to explain the actions of blood sugar, health, congenital strength, and so on .  Most westerners focus on the unseen, unmeasurable, energetic qi postulate, but most actual
  PUT YOUR MIND IN YOUR DANTIAN? From a question by Mander Thiara and one other person. When I allow forces (say, a weight that I'm holding) to go through my body and rest on the ground at the soles of my feet, I am letting the ground do a lot of the work. If I push someone while leaving my hands connected to the soles of my feet, the ground provides the solidity and all I have to do is add a little extra force (usually with the dantian/backbow) to push effectively. By making sure that I always source my forces at the soles of my feet, I have to pay attention and "keep my mind in the soles of my feet". It's called "sink your qi". When I am used to using jin from my feet but have learned to control the forces with my dantian, my body becomes more efficient, although such a skill takes a while to develop. But ultimately, by keeping your focus on moving jin and pushing from the dantian area, you learn to use jin and qi better. But to focus on movement and
  PUSHING FROM THE SOLE OF THE FOOT? OR THE DANTIAN? July 9, 2021 It's a quirk of mine to focus on sinking all forces to the sole of the foot, aka "sink the qi". In other words, "sink the qi to the sole of the foot". But the common saying is "sink the qi to the dantian", isn't it? The reason I say to sink the qi to the sole of the foot is that most people don't have any dantian development so when they try to "move from the dantian", their source of forces is not the sole of the foot. Hence, they screw it up. It takes a while to develop movement from the dantian, so I always suggest that people focus on the force line straight between the sole of their foot and their hand(s). If they learn to push or absorb forces from the sole/ground, they will be far ahead of any wrong movements from the non-existent dantian. All of that having been said, someone asked me what the next step is, so I'll offer a suggestion. You don't
  DON'T BLOCK THE QI? The Chinese perspective of movement and body mechanics was postulated long ago and their approach was different from the current western view of movement and physiology. Let's look at some of the major differences. First of all, strength was seen to follow various routes through the body. For example, if I hold a glass of water in front of me, there is a traceable path from my hand, along the top of my arm, over the shoulder, down the back, down the back of the leg, to the outside of the foot. They thought generally in terms of routes of strength, or "channels". Secondly, if I am holding a glass of water in front of me, the force/tension path must ultimately end at the ground at my feet. Conversely, if I was pulling something downward, the path would be along the front of my body and would end at the center of my weight in the abdominal area. So, a path of strength will draw some of its power from either the solidity of the ground or the dow